2002 Meeker Merlot, Winemaker’s Handprint Collection
$30-$36
WebWino says:
To know me is to know I love all things art and wine, especially a combination of the two. So it comes as no surprise that twice I have been gifted a bottle of Meeker Merlot from the Winemaker’s Handprint Collection. The bottle is wonderful. On it is a colorful handprint, not a label or sticker, but a genuine dipped in paint and smacked on the bottle handprint. Great stuff. Too bad you can’t say the same for the wine.
My first bottle was a 1999 Meeker Merlot from Mendocino County. When I tried this wine, I was not into decanting wine. Or really appreciating it, for that matter. All I drank was Merlot and quantity was key. But even that limited insight couldn’t get me past the fact that the wine was awful. Fantastic bottle (a great conversation piece I still keep on my mantle) but lousy wine.
Fast forward to last night, when I decided to crack open my latest gift bottle with friends. I was eager to give the wine a fair shake, this time by decanting and applying my new and “matured” (no snickering) tastes. Plus, the 2002 Meeker Merlot was from Sonoma County, and all good things come from Sonoma, right?
Much of the discussion surrounding this wine was an attempt to describe the flavor that dominated the undertaste on the finish. Words being thrown out were metallic, raisiny, acidic, and “tastes like linseed oil.” All in all, a mediocre bottle of wine that needs to be dumped from the decanter since we didn’t even finish it.
Interesting I should find this write-up online credited to the Winemaker’s Notes:
Produced only in select years, our Winemaker’s Handprint is what all Merlots strive to be. It has deep, dark color, and its full-blown cherry nose is surrounded by toasty French oak. On the palate you’ll find sweet fruit of cherry and plum, with hints of leather, cola and vanilla. And the lingering finish hangs on like a jumper who’s changed his mind.
Huh. My advice? Dude, just jump. Linger no more. Just save the empty bottle for your mantle.